PERBANDINGAN EFEKTIFITAS METODE KONVENSIONAL DENGAN BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM) PADA PERHITUNGAN BIAYA PELAKSANAAN PROYEK KONSTRUKSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36761/hexagon.v6i2.6393Keywords:
BIM, Biaya, Revit, VolumeAbstract
The rapid development of the construction industry and the increasing complexity of projects demand more effective, efficient, and integrated planning methods. Building Information Modeling (BIM) emerges as a technological solution capable of digitally integrating design and construction processes to produce more accurate information. This study aims to compare work volume and cost estimation of the Rectorate Building construction project at the University of Technology Sumbawa using both conventional and BIM methods. A comparative approach was employed, utilizing Autodesk Revit as the 3D modeling instrument. The cost estimation was based on the 2012 Unit Price Analysis (AHSP) of Sumbawa Regency. The results showed a cost difference of Rp 80,656,000 or approximately 4.8%, with BIM providing a lower estimate than the conventional method. This difference reflects BIM’s superiority in accuracy of quantity calculation and material efficiency, supported by three-dimensional visualization and early design conflict detection. Therefore, it can be concluded that BIM is more effective in supporting cost planning and can be relied upon as a modern approach in construction management.
References
Aulia Rachman, T., Purnamasari, E., Teras, D., & Vesellia, E. Della. (2024). Literature Review Penerapan BIM Dalam Manajemen Konstruksi Di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Tahun 2024 (SENASTIKA 2024), 2024(Senastika). https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/PIUOK/article/viewFile/17716/7134
Chia, K. C., Koo, C. H., Lau, S. H., & Lee, M. L. (2021). A Case Study of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for Subsurface in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1144(1), 012073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1144/1/012073
Hasanah Putri, A., & Sri Handoyo, S. (2023). Tinjauan Mendalam Tentang Teknologi Bim: Keunggulan, Tantangan, Dan Peluang Dimasa Depan Literature Review of Bim Technology: Advantages, Challenges, and Future Opportunities. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Kejuruan Dan Teknik Sipil (E-Journal, 1(3), 2023.
Luo, S., Yao, J., Wang, S., Wang, Y., & Lu, G. (2022). A sustainable BIM-based multidisciplinary framework for underground pipeline clash detection and analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 374(133900). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133900
Maharani, S., Purnomo, A., & Khanza, M. (2025). Implementasi BIM 4D untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi Penjadwalan Ulang Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung. 9(2023), 22594–22601.
Mahyuddin, Denny Indrawanto, S. N. A., Muhammad Ihsan Mukrim, Jamaluddin, Yuni Ulfiyati Riswal. K, Ryan Faza Prasetyo, I Ketut Hendra Wiryasuta Raflis, M. L., & Adi Papa Pandarangga, B. E. Y. E. (2024). Manajemen Konstruksi Strategi, Praktik, dan Tantangan Terkini (1st ed.). Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Mamdouh, M., Moursy, O., Hassan, A. A., & Gerges, V. F. (2024). A comparison between CAD system and building information modelling (BIM). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1396(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1396/1/012037
Muqsi, R. H., Fadhiil, M., Naufal, H., & Hutomo, D. A. (2024). Comparison Study Of Conventional And Bim-Based Approach In Estimating The Construction Cost Of Subsidized Housing. BESt: Journal of Built Environment Studies, 5(1), 1–10. www.jurnal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BEST
Novian, F.-. (2024). Isu Strategis Tantangan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Nasional Dan Infrastruktur Daerah Di Kabupaten Mandailing Natal Provinsi Sumatera Utara. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v9i2.23541
Ramadhani, J., & Rengganis, R. P. (2024). Analisis Penggunaan Teknologi Digital?: Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) dan Pemodelan 3D dalam Meningkatkan Keakuratan Desain Arsitektur. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, Seni, Dan Teknologi, 1, 156.
Rizqy, R. M., Martina, N., & Purwanto, H. (2021). Perbandingan Metode Konvensional Dengan Bim Terhadap Efisiensi Biaya, Mutu, Waktu. Construction and Material Journal, 3(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v3i1.3506
Sholeh, G. I. (2025). Efektivitas dan Akurasi Metode Manual dan BIM dalam Perhitungan Volume Pile Cap dan Pembesian Bangunan Gedung. Konstruksi: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Perencanaan Tata Ruang Dan Teknik Sipil, 3(2), 89–101.
Ulinnuha, N. Z., Handayani, F. S., & Rifai, M. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Conventional Methods with BIM Methods on Construction Cost Estimate at Structure Project Design Calculations (Case Study of Construction of A Satpol PP Building). Sustainable Civil Building Management and Engineering Journal, 1(4), 12. https://doi.org/10.47134/scbmej.v1i4.2698
Zakaria Rugas, Waluyo, R., & Almuntofa Purwantoro. (2024). Analisis Quantity Take Off Dengan Metode Building Information Modeling Pada Pekerjaan Struktur Gedung Poltekkes Palangka Raya. Jurnal Saintis, 24(01), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.25299/saintis.2024.vol24(01).16561
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Hexagon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
